Skip to content
Skip to content

For mediators and attorneys

Clients who arrive decided.

Your client couples work through the deck before the first session. You see progress, disclosure completeness, and the open-items agenda. Sessions start where the disagreement actually is.

Talk to us

Where the time goes now

The disclosure bottleneck

Weeks of chasing statements. The organizer tracks completeness per person and hands you an index, so you can see what is missing before the session rather than during it.

Session-two drift

What was agreed in the room comes apart by the next meeting. Resolutions are proposed, confirmed, attributed, and dated, and reopening one is visible to everyone.

The MOU evening

Writing up the memorandum after hours. The counsel packet drafts from the settled record today, and every token shows the name and date behind it. Filling it into your own templates is the direction, not the shape yet.

Asymmetric homework

One client prepares, the other does not. Progress is visible per person, so you can address the imbalance directly instead of discovering it in the room.

The question underneath

Does this cut our hours?

It removes hours. They are the hours clients resent paying for and most practitioners dislike performing: chasing statements, rebuilding the last session from notes, typing the memorandum at nine at night. It moves where the meter starts. It does not touch what the meter is for.

On a flat fee

Admin hours are cost, not revenue. Every hour spent chasing a pay stub comes out of the margin on a fee already agreed. Recovering four to six of them on a single mediation is worth more than a year of the subscription.

On an hourly rate

A disclosure stall does not lengthen a matter, it ends one. Couples who spend two months failing to gather documents lose momentum, and some never come back. Prepared clients mean more matters reaching an agreement, not thinner bills.

As review counsel

The amicable-review engagement is a job many practitioners decline or underprice, because the file arrives as a shoebox. A packet with the arithmetic shown and every figure attributed is a scope you can quote with confidence.

The arithmetic

Matrimonial rates commonly run $250 to $400 an hour. On a flat fee, four to six recovered admin hours is between $1,000 and $2,400 of margin you had already given away.

What it does not save you

The impasse. When two people want the same week in July, nothing in a database moves either of them.

The caucus. Reading a room and holding a private conversation is not a feature.

The judgment. Whether a deal is one a client should accept is a question the app is built never to answer.

The review. Somebody licensed still reads the agreement before anybody signs it.

Verification

Built to be checked, not trusted.

You are being asked to put your name near numbers a piece of software produced. The answer to that is not a promise about our quality. It is a packet your client's reviewing attorney can take apart.

The arithmetic

Every computed figure narrates its inputs, its rate, its statutory citation, and its steps, so a reviewer with a calculator can reproduce it by hand. The same figures are checked against a hand-worked set of test vectors in the code's own test suite.

The provenance

Every number carries who entered it, when, and what it came from: an uploaded statement, a linked account, or an estimate marked as one. Worksheet history is append-only.

The chronology

A dated, neutral record of the process: when disclosure was exchanged, when a decision was confirmed, when one was reopened, when a professional was retained.

No login required

The packet a reviewing attorney receives opens without an account on our platform. Checking our work does not mean joining anything.

Ask and we will walk you through what a packet looks like, before you talk to us about pricing. Ask to see one.

Drafting

A packet, not a rewrite.

The counsel packet exports as a Word file today, built from the settled record with every filled token traced to the answer, the person, and the date. Filling it into your own house templates is the direction this goes, not something shipped yet.

Your obligations, and the record of them

The parts you already have to do.

Conflicts

A conflicts check against the parties and the related names your practice records is not something the app runs. That stays yours, the way you already do it; nothing here stores or checks it for you.

Screening

Screening is your obligation and the app does not run one. Nobody answers safety questions here, and there is no screening record in the software. You screen the way you screen now, before either party starts.

Caucus

There is no mediator-only note space in the app today. A caucus conversation stays off the record the software keeps, the way it always has.

Legal process

A written retention, legal-hold, and subpoena-response policy, because the operator of a database is a third party holding it and your clients will eventually ask what that means.

Your own duty to vet a vendor is easier to discharge if we do the gathering. The security page carries the subprocessor list, our position on legal process, and where the independent audit stands. For your IT reviewer.

The question every professional asks

Do you compete with us?

We do not compete with you. The consumer app stops, permanently and by design, at a summary for professional review. Drafting belongs to the professional tier. That ceiling is a commitment today and not yet a mechanism: there is no tier in the schema and no licence term to hold us to it, which you should know before you take our word for it.

Who this is wrong for

It is not a litigation tool.

There is no position tracker, no leverage analysis, no view that belongs to one side. The data model holds two co-equal parties and a resolution requires the other one to confirm it. If you need a tool for a contested case, this is not it, and we are not going to build that.

Talk to us.

There is no self-serve signup for the professional tier yet. We onboard practices one at a time and want to hear how you work. Tell us where your last case lost time and we will tell you honestly whether this would have helped.

Email us